Shelby Steele: The Exploitation of Trayvon Martin... Protecting You From The UN-Frendly Skies... Prohibited Items Found 3/2 to 3/8... Congressional earmarks sometimes used to fund projects near lawmakers' properties... Public Law List (112st Congress - 2012)... Congress's Phony Insider-Trading Reform... Obama denounces Senate vote to block Cordray at consumer watchdog agency... Walker signs 'castle doctrine' bill, other measures... Holder faces House Republicans over health-care law, ‘Fast and Furious’... Postal workers behaving badly!... The supercommittee failed because Democrats insisted on $1 trillion in new taxes...
PositiveReform header image 4
When the people fear the government, there is tyranny; When the government fears the people, there is liberty.  ~ Thomas Jefferson

 

Entries Tagged as 'Government Circus'

‘Soul-searching’ Obama aides: Democrats’ midterm election losses a wake-up call

November 14th, 2010 · Accountability, Change of Power, Deception, Democrats, Dissention, Ethics, Government Control, Greed, Non-Transparency, Obama Exposed, Selling Out the US, Terrorism from Within

"Soul Searching" or "Tee Time"?

By Anne E. Kornblut Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, November 14, 2010; 12:41 AM

After nearly two weeks of introspection, President Obama‘s top advisers have concluded that the “shellacking” Democrats took on Election Day was caused in large part by their own failure to live up to expectations set during the 2008 campaign, not merely the typical political cycles and poor messaging they pointed to at first.

While the president has been on a trip to Asia for the past 10 days, all but a few of his top aides stayed behind to figure out what went so wrong and what to do about it. Wearing casual clothes and with the White House to themselves, they determined that the situation they face is serious and will take significant adjustments to reverse.

The advisers are deeply concerned about winning back political independents, who supported Obama two years ago by an eight-point margin but backed Republicans for the House this year by 19 points. To do so, they think he must forge partnerships with Republicans on key issues and make noticeable progress on his oft-repeated campaign pledge to change the ways of Washington.

Even more important, senior administration officials said, Obama will need to oversee tangible improvements in the economy. They cannot just keep arguing, as Democrats did during the recent campaign, that things would have been worse if not for administration policies.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ··········

No Comments

House Democrats could have same leadership team despite 60-seat loss

November 8th, 2010 · Accountability, Deception, Democrats, Dissention, Greed, Non-Transparency, Politics

Thank you America, may I have another?

By Paul Kane -Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, November 7, 2010; 8:05 PM

House Democratic leaders signaled a desire Sunday to avoid internal leadership battles in an effort to forge party unity, a move that would leave the same team in place that oversaw the worst political rout in 72 years.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (Md.) said that efforts are underway to avert an ideological leadership campaign that would pit House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (Md.) and Majority Whip James E. Clyburn (S.C.) against each other for the position of minority whip.

Hoyer, 71, has been considered the leadership’s bridge to conservative Democrats and Clyburn, 70, is the highest-ranking African American congressman ever. They spent the weekend making calls in an effort to secure enough votes for the No. 2 leadership post after the decision by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) to remain in power next year as minority leader.

“They’re both going to be at the table, I’m absolutely convinced, in terms of helping provide guidance,” Van Hollen, a Pelosi ally, said on CNN’s “State of the Union,” adding that some accommodation will be made to keep Hoyer and Clyburn in leadership positions. “I’m confident that the members of the caucus recognize that both gentlemen bring an enormous amount to the job, and we will work it out.”

Soon to be out of power, House Democrats are trying to map out their future with one fewer spot among leaders because the hierarchy gives the majority an additional spot, based on who holds the speaker’s gavel. With Pelosi, 70, still unchallenged, moderates who survived Tuesday’s midterm elections desperately want to keep Hoyer’s voice inside a leadership group that is otherwise dominated by liberals. The more than 40 members of the Congressional Black Caucus do not want Clyburn ejected, either.

Pelosi’s leadership team faces what could be an equally problematic issue. Many rank-and-file Democrats are enraged about the loss of 60 or more seats. Some are also disenchanted with the leaders in their 70s who have served in the top three spots for the past five years, with Pelosi and Hoyer being Nos. 1 and 2 for the past eight years, according to interviews with lawmakers, top aides and outside advisers.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ····

No Comments

Assessing midterm losses, Democrats ask whether Obama’s White House fully grasped voters’ fears

November 8th, 2010 · Accountability, Change of Power, Congress, Democrats, Dissention, Obama Exposed, Politics

By Karen Tumulty and Dan Balz Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, November 7, 2010; 12:46 AM

President Obama‘s failure to channel the anxieties of ordinary voters has shaken the faith that many Democrats once had in his political gifts and his team’s political skill.

In his own assessments of what went wrong, the president has lamented his inability to persuade voters on the merits of what he has done, and blamed the failure on his preoccupation with a full plate of crises.

But a broad sample of Democratic officeholders and strategists said in interviews that the disconnect goes far deeper than that.

“There doesn’t seem to be anybody in the White House who’s got any idea what it’s like to lie awake at night worried about money and worried about things slipping away,” said retiring Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen (D). “They’re all intellectually smart. They’ve got their numbers. But they don’t feel any of it, and I think people sense that.”

Bredesen had voiced such reservations long before the election, but more Democrats are saying the same thing after Tuesday’s defeats – although few are willing to cross the White House by doing so publicly.

Obama “is not Bill Clinton in the sense that he’s not an extrovert. He doesn’t gain energy by connecting with people,” said a Democratic strategist, who worked in the Clinton White House and asked not to be named while offering a candid criticism. “He needs to be forced to do it, either by self-discipline or others. There’s no one around him who will do that. They accommodate him, and that is a bad thing.”

William A. Galston, a Clinton White House policy adviser who is now a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said the midterm election revealed what had always been a “missing middle” to the Obama campaign message.

“Hope is a sentiment, not a strategy, and quickly loses credibility without a road map,” Galston wrote in a paper released two days after the election. “Throughout his first two years in office, President Obama often struggled to connect individual initiatives to larger purposes.”

With the public skeptical of and even hostile to his biggest accomplishments, including the economic stimulus package and the health-care overhaul, Obama fell back on a plea to voters not to turn back to failed Republican policies. That appeal “just missed what was happening with the country and with people,” said Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg.

Still, Democrats remain divided between their moderate and liberal wings over whether the president should continue to push hard with his agenda or move to the center to try to accommodate the Republicans in Congress.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ··

No Comments

The Pelosi Minority: The Speaker decides to reward herself for an epic defeat.

November 6th, 2010 · Accountability, Democrats

We’re beginning to wonder if any Democrats take responsibility for this week’s election rout. President Obama blamed it Wednesday on a failure to communicate rather than substance, and now Speaker Nancy Pelosi is making a bid to keep her job as House Democratic leader. Lose 61 seats? Whatever.

As an historical matter, Mrs. Pelosi’s announcement yesterday was almost as extraordinary as the election itself, which saw the largest turnover of House seats since 1938. Speakers almost always resign after an electoral repudiation—even Newt Gingrich, who stepped down after the GOP lost a handful of seats in 1998 while retaining the majority. The last Speaker who accepted a demotion to minority leader was Democrat Sam Rayburn in 1946, who reclaimed the gavel two years later on Harry Truman’s coattails.

Presumably Mrs. Pelosi is entertaining similar hopes, which suggests that Democrats really do believe their own post-election spin. How else to explain her bid as a matter of political logic?

Remaining in power deprives her party of one of its better opportunities to show the public that Tuesday’s message was received. Even if Democrats have no plans for a policy turn, sacrificing the unpopular Mrs. Pelosi might stand as a down payment on winning back the trust of the independent and suburban voters who fled Democrats this year. Something like a dozen House Democrats ran against her as much as they did against their GOP opponents.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ···

No Comments

Judge questions Justice Department’s lawsuit against Arizona immigration law

November 2nd, 2010 · Accountability, Democrats, Dissention, Homeland Security, Immigration, Immigration, National Security, Obama's Scheme, Selling Out the US, Terrorism from Within, Terrorist Threat

By Jerry Markon Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, November 1, 2010; 6:27 PM

A federal appellate judge expressed deep skepticism Monday about a Justice Department lawsuit challenging Arizona’s new immigration law, leaving uncertain the Obama administration’s chances of stopping the law from taking effect.

Judge John T. Noonan Jr. grilled administration lawyers at a hearing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. He took aim at the core of the Justice Department’s argument: that the Arizona statute is “preempted” by federal law and is especially troublesome because it requires mandatory immigration status checks in certain circumstances.

“I’ve read your brief, I’ve read the District Court opinion, I’ve heard your interchange with my two colleagues, and I don’t understand your argument,” Noonan told deputy solicitor general Edwin S. Kneedler. “We are dependent as a court on counsel being responsive. . . . You keep saying the problem is that a state officer is told to do something. That’s not a matter of preemption. . . . I would think the proper thing to do is to concede that this is a point where you don’t have an argument.”

“With respect, I do believe we have an argument,” said Kneedler, who asserts that the Arizona law is unconstitutional and threatens civil liberties by subjecting lawful immigrants to “interrogation and police surveillance.”

The exchange came at a hearing on efforts by the Justice Department to overturn the Arizona law, which empowers police to question people they suspect are in the country illegally and has triggered a fierce national debate. A federal judge in Phoenix issued a July injunction blocking the law’s most contested provisions from taking effect. Arizona appealed, leading to the Monday hearing.

With Noonan, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan, so bluntly stating his views, legal experts said the government’s chances of having the injunction upheld may rest with the other two judges on Monday’s panel: Carlos T. Bea and Richard A. Paez.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ······

No Comments

Bill Clinton appears with Meek at Orlando rally a week after reportedly urging him to drop out.

November 2nd, 2010 · Deception, Democrats, Dissention, Politics

By Annie Gowen Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 2, 2010; 1:05 PM

A week after former president Bill Clinton reportedly urged U.S. Rep. Kendrick B. Meek to withdraw from the Florida Senate race for the good of the Democratic Party, Clinton appeared beside his friend and protege to rally the faithful on election eve in Orlando.

Clinton had reportedly asked Meek to step aside in a three-way race so that the independent candidate running second in the polls, Gov. Charlie Crist, would have a better chance of beating Republican front-runner Marco Rubio.

Monday night, however, there seemed little tension between Clinton and Meek as the former president – ever the energizer campaigner – leapt onto the stage and clasped hands with his old friend, whom he has known since Meek was a young state trooper in 1991. The job of introducing Clinton went to Alex Sink, the Democratic gubernatorial candidate.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ··

No Comments

In emotionally charged times, calls arise for impeachment of a justice or two

November 1st, 2010 · Accountability, Ethics, Supreme Court

By Robert Barnes – Monday, November 1, 2010

All across the country Tuesday, political incumbents are bracing for judgment from an angry electorate. So perhaps members of the Supreme Court should not be surprised that they are in somebody’s sights, as well.

Justices, of course, can’t be voted out. They serve for life, or as the Constitution puts it, “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.”

But that hasn’t stopped calls from the left and the right recently for the House to open impeachment hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

None of the complaints is gaining traction, but they do seem to indicate a desire to do something about the court’s rulings or recent developments that some say violate testimony given at justices’ confirmation hearings.

“These are sulphurous times,” said Dennis Hutchinson, a Supreme Court scholar at the University of Chicago law school. “And the only stick you can wave at a federal judge is impeachment.”

He quickly noted that such demands almost never get very far.

The only justice ever served with impeachment was Samuel Chase, accused in 1805 of being overtly partisan. He was cleared by the Senate and served another six years.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ········

No Comments

Virginians share lesson learned: GOP in power not so bad

October 31st, 2010 · Accountability, Democrats, Dissention, Obama Exposed

By Rosalind S. Helderman – Saturday, October 30, 2010; 12:12 AM

President Obama and other Democrats are going around the country making the same argument as party leaders made in Virginia last year: If you elect Republicans, they’ll drive the car right back into the ditch. (Which is better that the Democrats burying US alive.)

Virginians overwhelmingly ignored that advice, and a year later many say they have few regrets and are generally pleased – if not ecstatic – about what Republicans have done.

Voters, including some who didn’t back him, credited Gov. Robert F. McDonnell with working hard and engineering deep budget cuts from a generally fractious General Assembly with relatively little heartache. The result of those efforts was a narrow surplus by the end of the fiscal year, achieved through bipartisan action and without the tax increase that Gov. Timothy M. Kaine proposed before leaving office.

“This state hasn’t gone backwards,” said Steven Herborn, 55, of Chesapeake. He has supported candidates in both parties over the years but wants Republicans to take over Congress next week.

“Nothing bad has happened,” he said. “The schools are no worse. The roads? We’ve always had a problem with the roads in Virginia.”

Despite dire warnings from Democrats about what will happen if Republicans take over, the message doesn’t seem to be sticking. In a Washington Post-ABC poll this month, only 50 percent of Democrats said a GOP Congress would be “a bad thing.”

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ······

No Comments

ObamaCare and Voters: Clinton and Obama told Democrats it would be popular. Whoops.

October 31st, 2010 · Corruption, Dissention, Healthcare, Obama's Scheme, Selling Out the US, Terrorism from Within

By the time anyone finds out, the bill will already have passed!!

Midterm elections amid a lousy economy are usually bad for the President’s party, but it looks as if a neutron bomb may detonate on Democrats in 2010. And one of the major reasons that this year shifted from ordinary losses to potential catastrophe is ObamaCare. This election is a referendum on an entitlement the public never wanted and continues to hate, as evidence from around the country is showing.

Take almost any poll at random. Even this week’s New York Times-CBS poll has repeal leading among likely voters, 47% to 43%. The latest Pew-National Journal survey shows that a majority of likely voters—51%—favors repeal, including 53% of independents. The Real Clear Politics average of all polling shows support for the law at 40.9%—and opposition at 50.6%.

The Kaiser Family Foundation—whose outlier tracking poll has consistently shown the most ObamaCare support—now reports that only 42% view the law favorably. That’s a seven-point drop since September, and it happened to coincide with the start date for the “patients bill of rights,” which Kaiser says is among the bill’s popular parts. Voters are learning that mandates—like those that allow “children” to remain on their parents’ health insurance until age 26—tend to increase costs.

There are many other such scales-from-the-eyes moments. The New England Journal of Medicine, another outlet for ObamaCare partisans, recently conceded in a “perspective” akin to an editorial that “it seems clear that Americans today have very negative views about the general direction of the country,” in large part because of the health bill.

Speaking of the shock of recognition, there’s the case of Earl Pomeroy. The nine-term North Dakota Democrat earned liberal plaudits for his numerous TV ads defending ObamaCare and his vote for it, as well as blasting Republican Rick Berg for ostensibly putting “big insurance first.”

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ··········

No Comments

Price tag of midterm campaign likely to hit $4 billion: Helping America HOW??

October 29th, 2010 · Corruption, Deception, Economy, Ethics, Government, Politics

By Dan Eggen Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 27, 2010; 10:17 PM

The midterm numbers just keep piling up.

In the latest sign of this year’s record-breaking election season, an independent research group estimated Wednesday that candidates, parties and outside interest groups together could spend up to $4 billion on the campaign.

Data from the Center for Responsive Politics provide evidence for a spending surge, even without a White House race. Expenditures have eclipsed what they were when George W. Bush won the presidency in 2000. The current election makes that contest “look like a bargain,” said Sheila Krumholz, CRP’s executive director.

There are three general tides of money swamping this year’s elections, according to CRP’s data: House and Senate candidates, who have reported raising $1.7 billion; the political parties, with about $1.1 billion; and outside interest groups, which have raised at least $400 million.

That adds up to $3.2 billion, but the numbers are incomplete amid the frenzy of ad buys and other activity in the week before the election. Candidate campaigns alone are on pace to eclipse $2 billion, which is a remarkable number, given restrictions on contributions.

Other patterns are also becoming clearer as the data accumulate. Donations from Wall Street, medical and insurance firms, energy conglomerates and other corporations have shifted decisively toward Republicans over the past year because of policy disputes with Democrats and anticipation of a possible GOP takeover in Congress.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ··········

No Comments