Congressional earmarks sometimes used to fund projects near lawmakers' properties... Congress's Phony Insider-Trading Reform... Obama denounces Senate vote to block Cordray at consumer watchdog agency... Walker signs 'castle doctrine' bill, other measures... Holder faces House Republicans over health-care law, ‘Fast and Furious’... Postal workers behaving badly!... The supercommittee failed because Democrats insisted on $1 trillion in new taxes... Happy Thanksgiving!... Supercommittee announces failure in effort to tame debt... Happy Veterans Day to the brave men and women of the United States Armed Forces....
PositiveReform header image 4
When the people fear the government, there is tyranny; When the government fears the people, there is liberty.  ~ Thomas Jefferson

 

Entries from September 10th, 2010

U.S. effort to help Afghanistan fight corruption has complicated ties

September 10th, 2010 · Corruption, Deception, Democrats, Economy, Federal Spending, Foreign Policy, Government Control, Greed, Non-Transparency, Obama's Scheme, Selling Out the US, Tax Dollars, Treason

By Greg Miller Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 10, 2010; 1:04 AM

In the span of several months, U.S.-backed investigative teams have assembled alarming evidence of rampant corruption in Afghanistan and the extent to which it reaches the highest ranks of that nation’s government.

But the American effort to increase Afghanistan’s capacity to combat corruption has also had unintended consequences, aggravating the U.S. relationship with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and producing embarrassing revelations that have undermined attempts to build popular trust in the government in Kabul – a key component of the Obama administration’s counterinsurgency campaign.

After pouring more resources into the anti-corruption effort over the past 18 months – including teams of advisers and sophisticated wiretapping technology – administration officials said there is growing concern that rooting out graft is paradoxically reinforcing perceptions that the problem is endemic.

“Our big push to help build Afghan institutions for transparency and anti-corruption has had the dismaying effect of bringing a lot of stuff to light that has sparked political crises,” said a senior administration official. “Afghan institutions are growing more capable” of fighting corruption, the official said. But their work has the potential to “set us back.”

The quandary in many ways reflects the extent to which the U.S. government has operated at cross-purposes in Afghanistan, doling out vast sums of money to win over warlords and buy security for military convoys, then cracking down on abuse in a system awash in American cash.

After nearly nine years of nation-building in Afghanistan, experts said, the U.S. government faces mounting evidence that it has helped to assemble one of the most corrupt governments in the world.

“I don’t know how you can disaggregate the way in which [the U.S. government] has funneled money into Afghanistan from the crisis of corruption that presents itself today,” said C. Christine Fair, an assistant professor at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service who has monitored the U.S. role in Afghanistan. “We are a government at odds with ourselves.”

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ···············

No Comments

The Obama Heyday Is Over

September 10th, 2010 · Accountability, Change of Power, Democrats, Dissention, Obama Exposed

With so many Democrats running against the president’s agenda in the midterm, change will come in the next Congress, regardless of which party is in control.

By Kimberley A. Strassel

Barack Obama hit the campaign trail this week to resurrect some of that hopey-changey stuff and to complain that his critics talk about him “like a dog.” Turns out the president wasn’t, in fact, referring to his own party.

Voters might be forgiven the confusion. It isn’t as if Democrats have been showing Mr. Obama much love. Quite the opposite. Seven weeks from Election Day, the vulnerable wing of the majority has finally found itself a campaign issue: blunt opposition to Mr. Obama and his agenda.

Has it only been 20 months? Candidate Obama swelled into office with an ambitiously liberal plan. He promised his party that his legislative items would be more than policy triumphs; they’d be political triumphs. Stick with me, he said, and we’ll get credit for leadership. Voters will come to love this stuff. Polls will improve. I’ll campaign in your district.

It was bunk, as many Democrats knew even back then. Witness the threats and bribes necessary to coax a bare majority for every vote. But enough went along. And now that the ambitious Obama experiment in liberal governance is going kaboom, his members—even those who voted with him—are running for cover.

Health care? A total of 279 House and Senate Democrats voted for ObamaCare. Not one is running an ad touting that vote. How can they, given headlines about Medicare cuts and premium hikes? You will, however, find a growing catalogue of ads such as this one from Maryland Rep. Frank Kratovil: “As a career prosecutor, I made decisions on facts, not politics,” and that’s why “I voted against . . . the health-care bill.”

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ···

No Comments