Shelby Steele: The Exploitation of Trayvon Martin... Protecting You From The UN-Frendly Skies... Prohibited Items Found 3/2 to 3/8... Congressional earmarks sometimes used to fund projects near lawmakers' properties... Public Law List (112st Congress - 2012)... Congress's Phony Insider-Trading Reform... Obama denounces Senate vote to block Cordray at consumer watchdog agency... Walker signs 'castle doctrine' bill, other measures... Holder faces House Republicans over health-care law, ‘Fast and Furious’... Postal workers behaving badly!... The supercommittee failed because Democrats insisted on $1 trillion in new taxes...
PositiveReform header image 4
When the people fear the government, there is tyranny; When the government fears the people, there is liberty.  ~ Thomas Jefferson

 

Entries from February 25th, 2010

Temporary Extension Act of 2010

February 25th, 2010 · Appropriations, Public Law

Document are available for download in PDF format.

Authenticated by the United States Government Printing Office

  • 2010-02-25 111 HR-4691-EH (Passed by House)
  • 2010-02-26 111 HR-4691-PCS (Placed on Calendar in Senate)
  • 2010-03-02 111 HR-4691-ENR (Passed by House & Senate) (Posted 03/06/2010)
  • 2010-03-02 Public Law 111-144 (Posted 03/30/2010) 
  • Reference:

    Tags:

    No Comments

    Why do Terrorists have ANY ‘Rights’ in America?

    February 24th, 2010 · Defense, Homeland Security, Obama's Scheme, Supreme Court, Terrorism from Within, War on Terrorism

    ‘Those who would apose America should not be protected by the rights America’

    Supreme Court weighs free speech against aid to terrorists

    Congress decided “when you help Hezbollah build homes,” you help Hezbollah “build bombs,” Solicitor General Elena Kagan said. (Jose Luis Magana/associated Press)

    By Robert BarnesWashington Post Staff Writer
    Wednesday, February 24, 2010

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday explored the tension between Americans’ right to free speech and a federal law that prohibits aid to terrorist groups, and hardly anyone seemed clear about the lines of demarcation.

    The case stems from a challenge to an antiterrorism act by American advocates who say they want to support only the peaceful efforts of groups that the State Department has deemed to be terrorist organizations.

    “This is a difficult case for me,” allowed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, whose vote often is the one that decides closely divided cases.

    Georgetown law professor David D. Cole, who represents the Humanitarian Law Project, said his clients do not want to provide material support to the groups, but only to help them pursue peaceful ways to end conflict. “The government has spent a decade arguing that our clients cannot advocate for peace, cannot inform about international human rights,” Cole told the court.

    [View Complete Article →]

    Tags: ··

    No Comments

    Death toll in Afghan war nears 1,000

    February 24th, 2010 · Defense, National Security, War on Terrorism

    By Craig Whitlock, Greg Jaffe and Julie Tate Washington Post Staff Writers
    Wednesday, February 24, 2010

    More than eight years after the Taliban was toppled from power, the number of U.S. military fatalities in the war in Afghanistan is nearing 1,000, a grim milestone in a resurgent conflict that is claiming the lives of an increasing number of troops who had survived previous combat tours in Iraq.

    As of Tuesday, 996 U.S. military personnel had died while serving in Operation Enduring Freedom. The roll call of the fallen began on Oct. 10, 2001, when Air Force Master Sgt. Evander E. Andrews was killed in a forklift accident in Qatar while building an airstrip in preparation for the invasion of Afghanistan. The latest confirmed addition came Sunday, when Army Pfc. J.R. Salvacion, 27, of Ewa Beach, Hawaii, died of wounds suffered when insurgents attacked his unit near Kandahar.

    The number of dead is small in comparison with U.S. casualties in Iraq, where 4,366 uniformed personnel have died since 2003. But as operations intensify in Afghanistan, the war is killing more and more service members who came home safely after serving in Iraq, only to return to the battlefield in another theater.

    Since Dec. 1, at least 30 percent of the American military personnel who have died in Afghanistan have been veterans of the Iraq war, according to a Washington Post analysis.

    [View Complete Article →]

    Tags: ··

    No Comments

    CBO Update

    February 24th, 2010 · CBO Update

    The following has been added to CBO’s Web site (www.cbo.gov):

    Tags:

    No Comments

    Jobs for Sale – Senate passes $15 billion jobs bill – A Wolf in Sheeps Clothing

    February 24th, 2010 · Corruption, Deception, Economy, Ethics, Federal Spending, Government Control, Greed, Money Lost, Non-Transparency, Obama's Scheme, Politics, Selling Out the US, Tax Dollars, Taxes, Terrorism from Within, Unemployment

    Reference: Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriation Act (Amended to Include Jobs Bill)

    By Ben PershingWednesday, February 24, 2010; 10:57 AM

    The Senate easily passed a $15 billion jobs bill on Wednesday morning amid hope that the measure could provide a blueprint for other items on President Obama‘s agenda.

    The measure passed 70 to 28, with 13 Republicans joining 57 Democrats in support of the package. One Democrat, Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, voted against it.

    “We’ve had so much gridlock,” said Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), co-author of a key portion of the bill. Now, he said, “finally we have something” bipartisan to show the public.

    The legislation is the first element of what Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) has said will be a multipart “jobs agenda.” The measure includes a new program that would give companies a break from paying Social Security taxes on new employees for the remainder of 2010. It also carries a one-year extension of the Highway Trust Fund, an expansion of the Build America Bonds program and a provision to allow companies to write off equipment purchases.

    The next stop is the House, where Democratic leaders are weighing whether to pass the Senate version or go to conference to reconcile it with the $154 billion jobs bill the House passed in December.

    Wednesday’s passage of the Senate bill was made possible by five GOP defections on a procedural vote Monday — from two retiring senators from the economically depressed Midwest and three New Englanders seeking to maintain a foothold in a region where Republican officeholders have grown scarce in recent election cycles.

    Freshman Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) grabbed the headlines, deciding on the first big vote of his new career to side with Democrats and the two GOP moderates from Maine, Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia J. Snowe.

    Just days after Brown was greeted rapturously by attendees at the Conservative Political Action Conference, his vote on the jobs measure made Reid “very happy,” the majority leader said. Reaction on the right was less complimentary.

    One leader of the “tea party” movement has taken to calling the freshman “Benedict Brown,” and disillusioned conservatives filled Brown’s Facebook page with accusations that he was a “Judas” and a “sellout.”

    Democrats recognized early that Brown’s vote could be in play, given the message of independence he projected during his special-election campaign to succeed the late senator Edward M. Kennedy (D). Reid called Brown to lobby him and was increasingly confident as the vote approached that the chamber’s newest Republican would be willing to cross the aisle.

    On Tuesday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) declined to criticize Brown for his vote. “The Republican Party represents all parts of the country, different points of view,” McConnell said during a news conference. “We don’t expect our members to be in lockstep on every single issue, and we’re happy to have him here.”

    The votes of Collins and Snowe are frequently targeted by Democrats, and while neither senator said after the tally that she had been promised anything, both are eager for future jobs bills to include tax breaks and help for small businesses.

    Retiring Sen. George V. Voinovich (R-Ohio) was more specific, announcing Monday that he had agreed to back the jobs measure after getting a “commitment” from Reid that the Senate would take up a long-term reauthorization of the highway bill in 2010.

    Sen. Christopher S. Bond (R-Mo.), who is also not running for reelection, cited the bill’s funding for transportation projects in explaining his decision to side with Democrats. During Monday’s tally, Bond waited until the end to record his vote, not wanting to be the 60th “aye.”

    Democrats welcomed the result, suggesting that it could be a model for future endeavors.

    “Several of those ideas were Republican ideas, so it’s nice to see that there are Republicans who are willing to not follow blindly their leadership in their overall goal of filibustering,” said Sen. Robert Menendez (N.J.).

    Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who chairs the Environment and Public Works Committee, said she had helped rally support for the measure from the transportation industry. She said the lessons of Monday’s vote were that Democrats “should keep our bills very clear” and should make sure that “the American people who are involved in these issues get on the phone with their senators.”

    Republicans contend that the jobs bill’s lessons are not applicable to health-care reform or other, more ambitious legislation.

    Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) said the measure attracted support from his side of the aisle because it is modest.

    “There are plenty of opportunities for bipartisan cooperation,” he said. “Where we have trouble are these great big, comprehensive, 2,000-page, full-of-surprises, turn-the-country-upside-down pieces of legislation that cost so much. If the administration would stop biting off more than it could chew, I think we would have more progress.”

    Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) said the level of crossover support in the future would be based on whether Reid is willing to allow Republicans to help shape bills and offer amendments on the floor.

    “I think it’s going to depend on the nature of the bill and on whether he’s going to try to freeze out the minority party,” Cornyn said, adding that he would advise against reading too much into Monday’s vote: “Frankly, I just don’t think it was all that big of a deal.”

    Tags: ············

    No Comments

    Five reasons to worry about health-care reform

    February 23rd, 2010 · Democrats, Federal Spending, Healthcare, Obama's Scheme

    Jonathan Chait makes the case for continued optimism on health-care reform. I basically agree: I view American politics through a structural lens, and almost all of the relevant forces are pushing Democrats toward completing a bill. But in the interest of full disclosure, here’s what worries me:

    (1) The collective action problem: Even though passing a bill leaves all Democrats better off, voting for a bill leaves some Democrats worse off. There are members of the Democratic Party who desperately need a bill to pass, but also feel that they need to be able to vote against that bill. These people are probably going to lose their elections one way or the other, and virtually none of them seem willing to simply admit that and do an enormous amount of good for the American people before Democrats inevitably and predictably lose their unsustainably large majority.

    (2) Individuals are not rational: Which means predicting what they’ll do based on the “this makes overwhelming sense” criteria is not a foolproof strategy.

    [View Complete Article →]

    Tags: ··

    No Comments

    Congressional Black Caucus frustrated with jobs legislation

    February 23rd, 2010 · Economy, Ethics, Federal Spending, Government, Greed, Money Lost, Non-Transparency, Politics, Tax Dollars, Taxes

    By Perry Bacon Jr. Washington Post Staff Writer
    Tuesday, February 23, 2010

    As Congress focused almost exclusively on health care late last year, the Congressional Black Caucus loudly complained that rising unemployment among African Americans was not getting enough attention. To express that frustration, one bloc in the 43-member group briefly withheld its votes for a key bill that Democrats were trying to pass. The caucus released a list of demands to include in the legislation that would create jobs in low-income areas.

    But as the “jobs bill” winds its way through Congress, civil rights groups say the various versions of the legislation are not directly addressing the problems the caucus wanted to fix. When the House passed its $154 billion version in December, it did not include a request from black lawmakers that 10 percent of the money in each of its provisions go to communities where at least 20 percent of the people are low-income. The version of the package that overcame a filibuster threat in the Senate on Monday does not include the 10 percent formula, nor does it include the additional funding for youth employment programs that is in the House bill.

    [View Complete Article →]

    Tags: ······

    No Comments

    U.S. plans for possible delay in Iraq withdrawal

    February 23rd, 2010 · Defense, Federal Spending, Foreign Policy, Government Control, Obama's Scheme, War on Terrorism

    By Craig WhitlockWashington Post Staff Writer
    Tuesday, February 23, 2010

    The U.S. military has prepared contingency plans to delay the planned withdrawal of all combat forces in Iraq, citing the prospects for political instability and increased violence as Iraqis hold national elections next month.

    Under a deadline set by President Obama, all combat forces are slated to withdraw from Iraq by the end of August, and there remains heavy political pressure in Washington and Baghdad to stick to that schedule. But Army Gen. Ray Odierno, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, said Monday that he had briefed officials in Washington in the past week about possible contingency plans.

    Odierno declined to describe the plans in detail and said he was optimistic they would not be necessary. But he said he was prepared to make the changes “if we run into problems” in the coming months.

    [View Complete Article →]

    Tags: ·

    No Comments

    U.S. airstrike kills at least 27 Afghan civilians

    February 23rd, 2010 · Accountability, Defense, Foreign Policy, War on Terrorism

    By Joshua Partlow and Rajiv Chandrasekaran- Tuesday, February 23, 2010

    QALAT, AFGHANISTAN — A U.S. airstrike targeting a convoy of buses traveling in southern Afghanistan killed at least 27 civilians and wounded a dozen more in a bombing that could fuel a political backlash against the ongoing military offensive in Afghanistan.

    The Afghan cabinet condemned on Monday what it called the “unacceptable” attack and asked NATO troops to “coordinate with the Afghan security forces” before any operation. A statement issued by the cabinet said that 27 people, including four women and a child, died in the airstrike, while 12 others were injured.

    The top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, held a video conference Monday morning with task force and regional commanders across the country to remind commanders about the need for “the judicious application of fire,” according to a senior military official. “There was no danger to coalition forces” in the attack on the convoy, the official said. McChrystal, the official added, “was apoplectic.”

    [View Complete Article →]

    Tags:

    No Comments

    Senator Brown vote in favor of Democrat Big Government Spending

    February 23rd, 2010 · Deception, Democrats, Ethics, Federal Spending, Government Control, Greed, Money Lost, Non-Transparency, Obama's Scheme, Senate, Tax Dollars, Terrorism from Within, Unemployment

    From the bluest of states, a red senator of a different color

    By Dana Milbank Washington Post Staff Writer
    Tuesday, February 23, 2010

    So much for the Massachusetts Miracle.

    The election of Republican Scott Brown to Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat was supposed to bring a seismic change to national politics. It did just that Monday night, but not in the way Republicans had hoped.

    It was almost time to vote on the Senate jobs bill, the first major vote since Brown’s arrival. Republicans were counting on their new member to be their “41st vote,” the number needed to sustain filibusters and shoot down any and all Democratic proposals.

    Brown, his desk in the back corner, was the only Republican in the room as Senate Majority Harry Reid (D-Nev.) offered a final denunciation of the GOP before the vote. “My friends on the other side of the aisle are looking for ways not to vote for this,” he said, accusing them of putting “partisanship ahead of people.”

    As Reid spoke, Brown was leafing through a Senate face book, learning to recognize his new colleagues. As soon as the vote was called, he strode quickly into the well and interrupted the clerk as he read the roll.

    “Yes,” Brown said quietly, and then, having become Reid’s first vote, he rushed out of the room before Republican colleagues arrived. He stepped into the hallway, then waited for reporters to assemble around him.

    “I’m not from around here,” he said. “I’m from Massachusetts.”

    [View Complete Article →]

    Tags: ······

    No Comments