Shelby Steele: The Exploitation of Trayvon Martin... Protecting You From The UN-Frendly Skies... Prohibited Items Found 3/2 to 3/8... Congressional earmarks sometimes used to fund projects near lawmakers' properties... Public Law List (112st Congress - 2012)... Congress's Phony Insider-Trading Reform... Obama denounces Senate vote to block Cordray at consumer watchdog agency... Walker signs 'castle doctrine' bill, other measures... Holder faces House Republicans over health-care law, ‘Fast and Furious’... Postal workers behaving badly!... The supercommittee failed because Democrats insisted on $1 trillion in new taxes...
PositiveReform header image 4
When the people fear the government, there is tyranny; When the government fears the people, there is liberty.  ~ Thomas Jefferson

 

Entries Tagged as 'Greed'

Web companies fear Google’s reach

December 13th, 2010 · Accountability, Greed

By Jia Lynn Yang – Monday, December 13, 2010; 12:37 AM

Google this year has been gobbling up Web companies that look nothing like Google, from a social gaming start-up to a firm that powers most online sales for the airline industry.

As the tech giant spreads its reach, it is making new enemies who fear that once Google steps onto their turf it will use its almighty search engine to quash them. Now, these critics are pushing antitrust officials to block some of Google’s mergers or build a blockbuster case against the search behemoth, reminiscent of the government’s battle with Microsoft.

Yet as Google expands its ecosystem of products – a spread that already includes e-mail, a digital bookstore and cellphone software – it’s only become a bigger puzzle for regulators.

Antitrust law was crafted with bricks-and-mortar companies in mind, companies whose business lines fit into neat categories, not a firm like Google whose influence is spreading lightning-quick into different markets that are connected only by the Internet.

Google says its acquisitions help the company build a bigger menu of useful products for consumers. And the tech firm accuses competitors of waging their battles against the company in Washington, rather than going toe to toe on the Web.

“We’re a big company. We’re disruptive. We’re going to get scrutiny from governments around the world, and that just comes with the territory,” said Adam Kovacevich, Google’s senior manager of global communications and public affairs.

Antitrust enforcers at the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission are examining Google carefully with each big merger it proposes. But they have yet to allege the company is acting illegally as a dominant player on the Web.

Regulators in other countries have begun to act. The European Commission said last month that it is investigating charges that Google is suppressing search results for firms offering rival services, such as price comparisons for shoppers. The Texas attorney general is looking into similar allegations.

Antitrust officials everywhere are essentially turning over the same question: Can Google compete fairly with other companies when its go-to search engine determines what users find – or don’t find – on the Internet?

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

Emptying the pork barrel would hit some states especially hard

December 13th, 2010 · Accountability, Corruption, Deception, Economy, Ethics, Greed, Non-Transparency, Politics, Tax Dollars

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

Senate having trouble ‘doing business in the modern era’

December 13th, 2010 · Democrats, Federal Spending, Government Control, Greed, Non-Transparency

By Philip Rucker and David A. Fahrenthold Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, December 12, 2010; 7:06 PM

Last week, the U.S. Senate failed for the first time in 48 years to pass an annual bill authorizing money for national defense – not over disagreement about the part of the bill that would repeal a ban against gays serving openly in the military but on procedural grounds. Moderate lawmakers inclined to support the bill balked Thursday when a vote was called what they considered to be too soon.

Before that, the Democrats who control the Senate failed in their efforts to stop filibusters on three other bills, including one that would provide long-term medical care for Ground Zero emergency workers who developed health problems after helping victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

In a single afternoon, the Senate rebuked two constituencies revered by both parties: the military and the Sept. 11 rescuers.

The confounding actions left many in Washington to wonder whether this was an example of the dysfunction that increasingly seems to paralyze the Senate, the inevitable consequence of having a largely lockstep minority, or simply poor strategy by Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), who put some lawmakers in impossible binds. Or maybe all of the above.

An institution designed to chew over legislation slowly, refining and moderating bills passed by the House, now routinely chokes on them.

“Other than some exceptional moments, like health care, the Senate has a lot of trouble doing business in the modern era,” said Julian Zelizer, a professor of history at Princeton University. “Partisanship, combined with the rules of the Senate, make for an institution that doesn’t like . . . to act at all.”

After spending months consumed by debates over health care and financial regulations, lawmakers left little time to address the litany of other issues before them, creating a backlog including the hot-button issues of tax cuts for the wealthy.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

Government Unions vs. Taxpayers

December 13th, 2010 · Corruption, Deception, Democrats, Ethics, Greed

The moral case for unions—protecting working families from exploitation—does not apply to public employment.

By Tim Pawlenty

When Americans think of organized labor, they might think of images like I saw growing up in a blue-collar meatpacking town: hard hats, work boots, tough conditions and gritty jobs. While I didn’t work in the slaughterhouses, I did become a union member when I worked at a grocery store to help put myself through school. I was grateful for the paycheck and proud of the work I did.

The rise of the labor movement in the early 20th century was a triumph for America’s working class. In an era of deep economic anxiety, unions stood up for hard-working but vulnerable families, protecting them from physical and economic exploitation.

Much has changed. The majority of union members today no longer work in construction, manufacturing or “strong back” jobs. They work for government, which, thanks to President Obama, has become the only booming “industry” left in our economy. Since January 2008 the private sector has lost nearly eight million jobs while local, state and federal governments added 590,000.

Federal employees receive an average of $123,049 annually in pay and benefits, twice the average of the private sector. And across the country, at every level of government, the pattern is the same: Unionized public employees are making more money, receiving more generous benefits, and enjoying greater job security than the working families forced to pay for it with ever-higher taxes, deficits and debt.

How did this happen? Very quietly. The rise of government unions has been like a silent coup, an inside job engineered by self-interested politicians and fueled by campaign contributions.

Public employee unions contribute mightily to the campaigns of liberal politicians ($91 million in the midterm elections alone) who vote to increase government pay and workers. As more government employees join the unions and pay dues, the union bosses pour ever more money and energy into liberal campaigns. The result is that certain states are now approaching default. Decades of overpromising and fiscal malpractice by state and local officials have created unfunded public employee benefit liabilities of more than $3 trillion.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

House Democrats seek to delay Tax Cut until next year in fight for more spending money.

December 11th, 2010 · Corruption, Deception, Democrats, Economy, Ethics, Federal Spending, Greed, House, Taxes, Terrorism from Within

House Democrats seek changes to Obama’s tax-cut deal

By Lori Montgomery and Shailagh Murray Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, December 10, 2010; 12:58 AM

The House Democratic Caucus voted Thursday to try to block the tax-cut deal that President Obama struck with Republicans, a move that does not kill the legislation but shows that its opponents are digging in.

Rank-and-file Democrats passed a nonbinding resolution, introduced by Rep. Peter A. DeFazio (D-Ore.), by voice vote that said the tax package should not come to the House floor for consideration.

And in her first explicit declaration of dissatisfaction since the tax deal was cut, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) suggested that she would not bring the package to the floor in its current form.

“House Democrats share the president’s commitment to providing the middle class with a tax cut to grow the economy and create jobs” but “reject the Senate Republican tax provisions as currently written,” Pelosi said. “We will continue discussions with the president and our Democratic and Republican colleagues in the days ahead to improve the proposal before it comes to the House floor for a vote.”

After the caucus vote, House Majority Whip James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.) said: “People would like to see every opportunity to make revisions, and I’m one of them.” Asked whether he still expected the tax deal to come to the House floor for a vote, Clyburn said, “I don’t make those decisions.”

Said Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Tex.): “If it’s take it or leave it, we’ll leave it.”

At one point during the meeting on the vote, House Democrats erupted in a chant of “Just say no!”

The White House played down the drama.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

Reid plays school yard games as he seeks votes that are sure to fail: Not fit for Congress

December 8th, 2010 · Accountability, Democrats, Dissention, Ethics, Federal Spending, Government Control, Greed, Non-Transparency, Terrorism from Within

Reid salutes America...Not fit for Congress!

In political gamble, Reid seeks votes that are sure to fail

By David A. Fahrenthold Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, December 8, 2010; 5:17 PM

On Wednesday afternoon, the most powerful man in the U.S. Senate did something that sounds odd: He set himself up to lose an important vote.

Then he planned to do it again, on another key issue.

And then another.

And then another.

Four times in the same afternoon, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) planned votes where his favored bills were expected to fail. For Reid, failure is actually the point. He wants to put Republicans on record as blocking all four – which deal with immigration rules, police and firefighters’ unions, health benefits for responders to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and seniors’ benefits.

These “test votes” are a sign of the sclerotic state of Congress, clogged by filibuster threats. Usually, it is the people out of power who resort to grand, futile gestures.

Now – in a political gamble – it’s the guys in charge.

“Just because the party of ‘Just say no,’ has been blocking all these initiatives, it doesn’t mean we’re not going to try,” said Jim Manley, a spokesman for Reid. “At some point, you’ve got to take a stand, and let the chips fall where they may.”

Senate Democrats, who hold a majority in the chamber, held their last “test vote” on Saturday. That proposal called for an end to tax cuts, passed under President George W. Bush, on income greater than $250,000 for a family.

Democrats needed 60 senators to agree. They got just 53.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ·······

No Comments

Nancy Pelosi’s Unwelcome Christmas Gift: Increase Taxes quickly before new session of Congress.

December 2nd, 2010 · Change of Power, Deception, Democrats, Dissention, Economy, Ethics, Federal Spending, Greed, Non-Transparency, Selling Out the US, Taxes, Terrorism from Within

A couple earning $80,000 could lose hundreds per month if the Bush tax rates aren’t extended.

By KARL ROVE

After ignoring congressional Republicans for 22 months and 10 days, President Obama hosted a “come together, right now” session with them Tuesday. The topic: the Bush tax cuts—on income, capital gains and dividends—that are set to expire at the stroke of midnight, Dec. 31.

The atmospherics at the White House on Tuesday were good, but the meeting isn’t likely to produce a quick agreement on substance. A lot of attention has been paid to congressional Republicans, whose strong desire to preserve the Bush rates is apparent. Less attention has been paid to the Democrats—among whom there is no consensus about what to do.

OpinionJournal.com Columnist John Fund on the tax debate within the Democratic caucus, and on the fight for key committee chairmanships in the House.

Thanks to her dogmatic rigidity and unquenchable passion for class warfare, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi continues insisting on extending the Bush tax cuts only for those who make less than $250,000. Mrs. Pelosi doesn’t have the votes to pass her proposal using a special House rule, the suspension calendar, which requires a supermajority and does not permit amendments. She might well lose if the bill proceeds through normal House rules—Democrats could join with Republicans to offer an amendment allowing an up-or-down vote on extending all the Bush-era tax cuts, which could pass.

Even if Mrs. Pelosi’s measure cleared the House, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has apparently signaled it can’t pass the Senate. All 42 Republican senators support extending all Bush-era tax cuts, depriving Mr. Reid of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture. And there are Senate Democrats who also oppose raising taxes.

Since neither Mr. Obama nor Mr. Reid seem willing to force her to back down, Congress could go home without stopping the largest tax increase in the nation’s history.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ·········

No Comments

Obama Commission’s final deficit report preserves controversial spending cuts & tax increases

December 2nd, 2010 · Deception, Democrats, Economy, Ethics, Federal Spending, Government Control, Greed, Non-Transparency, Selling Out the US, Taxes, Terrorism from Within

By Lori Montgomery and Brady Dennis Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, December 1, 2010; 3:48 PM

The leaders of President Obama’s fiscal commission released a final report Wednesday that is full of political dynamite, recommending sharp cuts in military spending, a higher retirement age and reforms that could cost the average taxpayer an extra $1,700 a year.

But as commission co-chairmen Erskine Bowles and Alan K. Simpson unveiled the plan at a Capitol Hill hearing, it was unclear whether they would be able to build a convincing bipartisan consensus before the panel’s 18 members – 12 of them sitting lawmakers – are scheduled to vote on the report Friday.

The White House continued Wednesday to reserve judgment on the commission’s work, which is intended to help shape the administration’s next budget request, due out in February.

“The president looks forward to reviewing their work at the conclusion of their votes … and evaluating their proposals and their votes as we move forward and put together a budget of our own for next year,” said White House press secretary Robert Gibbs. “So let me not get too far out on the commission until they’ve had a chance to complete their work.”

Two panel members – Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) – immediately came out in strong support, saying that although they don’t like everything in the package, it charts a responsible path away from the abyss of rising debt and potential fiscal crisis.

“America is in danger. And we can either look the other way, hope somebody else does something, or we can act,” Conrad said. “I’m going to support this plan and support it strongly. Because I don’t see another alternative. I just don’t.”

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ············

No Comments

Even after their defeat, Democrats keep insisting on a tax increase.

December 2nd, 2010 · Democrats, Government Control, Greed, Non-Transparency, Selling Out the US, Taxes, Terrorism from Within

‘It is not a sensible way to run a country to have this magnitude of tax issues left to annual uncertainty,” said Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner earlier this month, and he’s certainly right about that. But at the current moment the single biggest obstacle to more certainty is his boss, President Obama, who still refuses to compromise on the tax increase set to whack the economy in a mere 30 days.

After meeting with Congressional leaders yesterday, Mr. Obama dispatched Mr. Geithner and budget director Jacob Lew to negotiate a deal. Yet the President is still holding out against even a temporary extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax rates. Republicans won 63 House seats running against those tax increases, but Mr. Obama still seems under the spell of the dead enders led by soon-to-be-former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The magnitude of the looming tax increase ought to snap him out of this hypnosis. If the Democrats who still run Capitol Hill for another month fail to act, tens of millions of American households will see their paychecks shrink immediately in the New Year.

OpinionJournal.com Columnist John Fund on the tax debate within the Democratic caucus, and on the fight for key committee chairmanships in the House.

Capital gains and dividend tax rates will climb to 20% and 39.6%, respectively, from 15%, and the top two income tax rates will climb to 38% and 41% (including deduction phaseouts), from 33% and 35%. The typical family with an income between $40,000 and $75,000 a year will pay as much as $2,000 more in 2011, as the 10% tax rate bracket and the $1,000 per child tax credit vanish.

This could have been resolved months ago, except that the White House and Congressional Democrats insist that some taxes must be raised. Mr. Obama wants the lower rates to expire on incomes of $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples. Dozens of Democrats revolted against that in the campaign, so the latest gambit, courtesy of New York Senator Chuck Schumer, would raise that threshold to $1 million.

Republicans shouldn’t be suckered into raising taxes on anyone, especially not on small business job creators. The U.S. corporate tax rate of 39% (a combination of state average and federal rates) is already about 15 percentage points above the international average, and for the first time in a generation the personal rate of 41% would rise above the average of our overseas rivals. That’s all before the 3.8% surtax on investment income arrives in 2013, courtesy of ObamaCare.

Because most nations tax their companies at a business rate lower than the personal rate, the Tax Foundation says the Obama plan would mean that many Subchapter S corporations in the U.S. would pay “virtually the highest tax rates in the world on their business income.” In other words, the after-tax rate of return on investment in the U.S. would fall relative to investing in Europe or Asia. This is an invitation to outsource more jobs. The U.S. should be cutting tax rates to become more competitive, as President Obama’s deficit reduction commission and tax reform advisory panel have recommended.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ·········

No Comments

Democrat Senate shuns push for elimination of pet projects: Votes for Money Stealing.

November 30th, 2010 · Accountability, Deception, Democrats, Economy, Ethics, Federal Spending, Greed, Non-Transparency, Selling Out the US, Tax Dollars, Terrorism from Within

By ANDREW TAYLOR – The Associated Press
Tuesday, November 30, 2010; 11:41 AM

WASHINGTON — The Senate Tuesday rejected a GOP bid to ban the practice of larding spending bills with earmarks – those pet projects that lawmakers love to send home to their states.

Most Democrats and a handful of Republicans combined to defeat the effort, which would have effectively forbidden the Senate from considering legislation containing earmarks like road and bridge projects, community development funding, grants to local police departments and special-interest tax breaks.

The 39-56 tally, however, was a better showing for earmark opponents, who lost a 29-68 vote earlier this year. Any votes next year should be closer because a band of anti-earmark Republicans is joining the Senate.

Earlier this month, Republicans bowed to tea party activists and passed a party resolution declaring GOP senators would give up earmarks. House Republicans have also given up the practice, but most Democrats say earmarks are a legitimate way to direct taxpayer money to their constituents.

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said Tuesday that Democrats had made the earmarking process far more transparent than it previously had been under GOP control of Congress. The reforms include requiring lawmakers to document every projects they seek and receive.

Seven Democrats voted with all but eight Republicans to ban the practice.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ·········

No Comments