Shelby Steele: The Exploitation of Trayvon Martin... Protecting You From The UN-Frendly Skies... Prohibited Items Found 3/2 to 3/8... Congressional earmarks sometimes used to fund projects near lawmakers' properties... Public Law List (112st Congress - 2012)... Congress's Phony Insider-Trading Reform... Obama denounces Senate vote to block Cordray at consumer watchdog agency... Walker signs 'castle doctrine' bill, other measures... Holder faces House Republicans over health-care law, ‘Fast and Furious’... Postal workers behaving badly!... The supercommittee failed because Democrats insisted on $1 trillion in new taxes...
PositiveReform header image 4
When the people fear the government, there is tyranny; When the government fears the people, there is liberty.  ~ Thomas Jefferson

 

Entries Tagged as 'Corruption'

House Democrats seek to delay Tax Cut until next year in fight for more spending money.

December 11th, 2010 · Corruption, Deception, Democrats, Economy, Ethics, Federal Spending, Greed, House, Taxes, Terrorism from Within

House Democrats seek changes to Obama’s tax-cut deal

By Lori Montgomery and Shailagh Murray Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, December 10, 2010; 12:58 AM

The House Democratic Caucus voted Thursday to try to block the tax-cut deal that President Obama struck with Republicans, a move that does not kill the legislation but shows that its opponents are digging in.

Rank-and-file Democrats passed a nonbinding resolution, introduced by Rep. Peter A. DeFazio (D-Ore.), by voice vote that said the tax package should not come to the House floor for consideration.

And in her first explicit declaration of dissatisfaction since the tax deal was cut, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) suggested that she would not bring the package to the floor in its current form.

“House Democrats share the president’s commitment to providing the middle class with a tax cut to grow the economy and create jobs” but “reject the Senate Republican tax provisions as currently written,” Pelosi said. “We will continue discussions with the president and our Democratic and Republican colleagues in the days ahead to improve the proposal before it comes to the House floor for a vote.”

After the caucus vote, House Majority Whip James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.) said: “People would like to see every opportunity to make revisions, and I’m one of them.” Asked whether he still expected the tax deal to come to the House floor for a vote, Clyburn said, “I don’t make those decisions.”

Said Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Tex.): “If it’s take it or leave it, we’ll leave it.”

At one point during the meeting on the vote, House Democrats erupted in a chant of “Just say no!”

The White House played down the drama.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

Senate convicts La. judge on impeachment charges

December 8th, 2010 · Accountability, Corruption

AP Photo

By BEN EVANS – The Associated Press
Wednesday, December 8, 2010; 11:57 AM

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Wednesday convicted U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Porteous of Louisiana on four articles of impeachment, making him just the eighth federal judge in history to be removed by Congress.

Porteous, who sat before senators in the well of the chamber as they voted separately on each count, declined to comment as he left the chamber. Attorney Daniel Schwartz said, “We’re obviously disappointed with the result.”

House prosecutors laid out a damaging case against Porteous, 63, a New Orleans native who was a state judge before winning appointment to the federal bench by President Bill Clinton in 1994. The prosecutors said gambling and drinking problems led him to begin accepting cash and other favors from attorneys and bail bondsmen with business before his court.

He also was accused of lying to Congress during his judicial confirmation and filing for bankruptcy under a false name.

The Senate voted unanimously to convict on one count and with a strong majority for each of the other three.

Porteous’ lead attorney, Jonathan Turley, acknowledged much of the behavior, saying the judge made mistakes but arguing that they were mostly personal failings that didn’t meet the “high crimes and misdemeanor” standard for impeachment. Turley also argued that many of the practices – such as accepting favors and expensive meals – were common in the Louisiana legal community.

But House prosecutors said the evidence showed a decades-long pattern of corruption. They told senators that allowing Porteous to remain on the bench would erode public confidence in the courts and make a mockery of the federal judiciary.

The Senate closed the chamber for more than two hours Tuesday night to deliberate on his fate. The Senate made its decision Wednesday in a solemn ceremonial vote in which senators sat at their desks and rose when called, saying “guilty” or “not guilty.”

Porteous offered little reaction as the decision became clear, mostly looking down at papers before him where an attorney kept a tally of the votes.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

Impeachment of Louisiana judge goes before Senate

December 8th, 2010 · Accountability, Corruption

AP – US District Judge G. Thomas Porteous, left, walks with his attorney Jonathan Turley, on Capitol Hill …

By Ben Evans – Tuesday, December 7, 2010; 11:45 PM

The attorney for an impeached federal judge on trial before the Senate argued Tuesday that Congress is pursuing unconstitutional charges against his client and would be breaking with two centuries of precedent by removing him from office.

Jonathan Turley told senators assembled in the chamber for the historic trial that some of the allegations against Judge G. Thomas Porteous are vague or exaggerated. Others, he said, involve conduct that occurred before Porteous was appointed to the federal bench.

“In the history of this republic, no one has ever been removed from office on the basis of pre-federal conduct,” Turley said, urging the senators to dismiss some of the most serious charges.

The lead House prosecutor, Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), responded that Porteous engaged in a persistent pattern of corruption throughout his career, before and after his federal service. Allowing Porteous, 63, to remain on the bench, Schiff said, would erode public confidence in the courts and make a mockery of the federal judiciary.

“He must be removed,” Schiff said.

The Senate is beginning the final stage of the case against Porteous, a U.S. District Court judge from Louisiana who could become just the eighth federal judge to be removed from office.

The House voted unanimously in March to bring four articles of impeachment against him. A two-thirds Senate vote is needed to convict. The proceeding is just the 16th judicial impeachment trial before the Senate.

House prosecutors allege that Porteous was racking up debt as he struggled with drinking and gambling problems. They say he began accepting cash, meals, trips and other favors from people with business before his court, beginning as a state judge in the 1980s and continuing after he was appointed to the federal bench by President Bill Clinton in 1994.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

Report details misdeeds of postal workers

December 8th, 2010 · Corruption

By Ed O’Keefe Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, December 7, 2010; 9:35 PM

Ever had one of those days when you just want to throw your work in the trash? At least two postal letter carriers did – and got caught.

Most of the nation’s almost 195,000 letter carriers this year swiftly completed their appointed rounds, but a few workers discarded mail or stole thousands of dollars of tax refunds and medication.

A Georgia letter carrier left the U.S. Postal Service in March after admitting he dumped more than 600 pieces of mail into a Dumpster, including Netflix DVDs and first-class mail. He told investigators that he threw out the mail because he wanted to be done for the day. The man is serving 12 months of probation, and he paid a $500 fine and $182 in restitution to Netflix.

A letter carrier in Alabama was caught on tape dumping more than 250 pieces of mail into a gas station Dumpster. She resigned from the Postal Service in August after pleading guilty to one count of delay of mail.

The bad behavior is detailed in the Postal Service Inspector General’s semiannual report to Congress, which covers the period from March to September this year. The watchdog team conducted more than 1,990 investigations that prompted 453 arrests – few of which involved postal employees – and more than $672 million in fines and restitution.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

Alaska native status gave tiny, inexperienced firm a $250 million Army contract

November 29th, 2010 · Accountability, Corruption, Deception, Greed, Non-Transparency

By Robert O’Harrow Jr. Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 26, 2010; 12:01 AM

In summer 2008, the U.S. military had a major problem. More than 2,400 service members had reported being sexually assaulted the previous year, and the number was rising. Congress wanted immediate action.

The Army responded by reaching out to a tiny firm in Delaware.

It was an unlikely choice for such a sensitive task. The year before, United Solutions and Services, known as US2, had just three employees and several small contracts for janitorial services and other work. It was based in a four-bedroom colonial, where the founder worked out of his living room.

But the firm had one quality the Army prized: It was co-owned by an Alaska native corporation (ANC) and therefore could receive federal contracts of any size without competition, under special set-aside exemptions granted by Congress to help impoverished Alaska natives.

On Sept. 2, 2008, US2 was granted a deal worth as much as $250 million – 3,000 times the $73,000 in revenue the firm claimed the year before. The contract enabled the Army to quickly fund a wide array of projects, including a global campaign to prevent sexual assault and harassment, without seeking outside bids.

US2 could not do the work by itself, though. With the Army’s knowledge, the firm subcontracted the majority of it to more established companies, a Washington Post investigation has found.

Federal rules generally require prime contractors on set-aside deals to perform at least half of the work, something US2 did not do on more than $100 million worth of jobs, according to interviews with Army officials and an analysis of federal procurement data.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

Charlie Rangel found guilty of 11 ethics violations

November 16th, 2010 · Accountability, Congress, Corruption, Democrats, Ethics, House

By Paul Kane Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 16, 2010; 2:15 PM

Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) was found guilty Tuesday of breaking 11 separate congressional rules related to his personal finances and fundraising efforts for a New York college.

The eight-lawmaker subcommittee that handled the trial – which reached a unanimous verdict on 10 of the counts – now sends the case to the full ethics committee for the equivalent of sentencing. Potential punishments include a formal reprimand or censure, with each of those punishments needing to be ratified by a vote on the House floor. Expulsion is also a possible remedy but considered highly unlikely.

Rangel was not present for the ruling, following his walk-out from the trial Monday when the panel rejected his request to delay the proceedings because his campaign account was empty and he had no political money left to cover the cost of a legal team.

He released a statement Tuesday calling the decision unfair. “How can anyone have confidence in the decision of the Ethics Subcommittee when I was deprived of due process rights, right to counsel and was not even in the room?” the statement said. “I can only hope that the full Committee will treat me more fairly, and take into account my entire 40 years of service to the Congress before making any decisions on sanctions. ”

Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), who chaired the trial, praised her colleagues for their handling of the case, which landed uncomfortably in their laps in July after talks broke down with Rangel over reaching a plea deal.

“This has been a difficult assignment, time consuming, and we have approached our duties diligently,” Lofgren said.

Lofgren said her panel, divided evenly between Democrats and Republicans, would meet again Tuesday to draft the final report to be sent to the full Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, which is the formal name for the ethics committee.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

9 more arrested in Prince George’s corruption probe

November 16th, 2010 · Corruption

By Ruben Castaneda, Rosalind S. Helderman and Paul Duggan Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, November 16, 2010; 12:16 AM

Nine people, including three Prince George’s County police officers, were arrested Monday on charges involving drugs, guns, and black-market alcohol and cigarettes as authorities ratcheted up a sprawling corruption probe in the county.

Federal agents conducted numerous searches around the county and moved to seize more than 30 homes, businesses and vehicles as part of the widening investigation into corruption in Prince George’s.

The nine suspects were arrested three days after County Executive Jack B. Johnson (D) and his wife were led from their home in handcuffs, accused of evidence-tampering in a probe of sweetheart land deals. Federal officials say the arrests are all connected.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags:

No Comments

House panel rejects Rangel’s request to delay corruption trial.

November 15th, 2010 · Accountability, Corruption, Democrats, Ethics, House

By Paul Kane Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, November 15, 2010; 10:35 AM

Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) pleaded with a House panel Monday to delay his long-awaited public trial on corruption charges, saying he needed time to find a new lawyer, but his request was rejected and the session went ahead without him.

The trial, conducted by an eight-member panel of Rangel’s congressional peers, is the first of its kind since 2002. Rangel faces allegations that he broke congressional rules in his personal finances and his fundraising efforts for a New York college. He and his previous legal team parted ways in September.

“I object to the proceeding,” Rangel told the House panel. “With all due respect, since I don’t have counsel to advise me, I’m going to have to excuse myself from these proceedings.”

He said he cannot afford a lawyer at present because his campaign account has been depleted.

The panel then went into closed session to consider the requested delay. The lawmakers later emerged and said the trial would go ahead.

Rangel asked that he be allowed to accept either pro bono legal work or reduced-fee support, but such actions might violate congressional rules forbidding gifts. Abbe Lowell, one of Washington’s premier white-collar defense lawyers, attended the hearing and said during the break that he would join Rangel’s defense if the panel postponed the hearing to allow Rangel time to raise money to pay Lowell’s fees.

Rangel has already burned through $2 million in legal fees, draining funds from his now wiped-out campaign account. When he told his former legal team that he would not be able to pay the estimated $1 million to finish the case, they withdrew from the case, he said Monday. He now wants to set up a separate legal defense fund that could provide legal support, but it may take weeks or months to finance the operation.

“I am being denied the right to have a lawyer,” he complained. He argued that “50 years of public service is on the line.”

The 40-year House veteran arrived in the hearing room inside the Longworth House Office Building precisely at 9 a.m., the scheduled start time, with his wife and other family members trailing behind.

He sat at a desk in front of the dais, in a room that is usually reserved for the House Administration Committee, which oversees mostly mundane matters of internal congressional management. Winking at photographers, Rangel brought with him some yellow legal pads, pens and a massive binder containing the case against him.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ···

No Comments

Jack Johnson, Prince George’s county executive, and his wife, Leslie, arrested

November 14th, 2010 · Accountability, Corruption, Ethics, Greed, Terrorism from Within

By Paul Schwartzman, Ruben Castaneda and Cheryl W. Thompson Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, November 13, 2010; 12:57 AM

Just after 10:12 a.m. Friday, Leslie Johnson frantically phoned her husband, Jack B. Johnson, the Prince George’s county executive.

Two FBI agents were at the front door of their two-story brick colonial in Mitchellville.

“Don’t answer it,” the county executive said, unaware that more agents were listening in.

Johnson ordered his wife to find and destroy a $100,000 check from a real estate developer that was hidden in a box of liquor.

“Do you want me to put it down the toilet?” Leslie Johnson asked.

“Yes, flush that,” the county executive said.

But what about the cash? she asked – $79,600.

Put it in your underwear, the county executive told his wife.

She replied, “I have it in my bra” – which is where agents discovered the money after she answered the door.

That conversation, as documented in an FBI affidavit, led to the arrest Friday of Jack Johnson and his wife. Each was charged with evidence tampering and destroying evidence in a case the U.S. attorney called the “tip of the iceberg” in a broader corruption investigation in Prince George’s.

“We don’t go on fishing expeditions,” U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein said at a news conference. “We expect additional defendants and additional charges.”

Appearing Friday night outside the federal courthouse in Greenbelt, Johnson vowed to fight.

Tags:

No Comments

MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann suspended for contributing to 3 Democratic candidates

November 6th, 2010 · Corruption, Democrats

By David MontgomeryWashington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, November 6, 2010

MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann, the unabashedly liberal-leaning counterpart to cable television’s conservative hosts, was suspended indefinitely without pay on Friday for contributing a total of $7,200 to three Democratic candidates in late October, in violation of network policies.

Olbermann’s banishment leaves uncertain the immediate future of MSNBC’s top-rated show, “Countdown With Keith Olbermann.” MSNBC initially said Christopher Hayes, Washington editor of the Nation, would fill in for Olbermann Friday night — then revised the announcement to say that daytime anchor Thomas Roberts would host. Who will take the helm in coming days has not been decided, a spokesman said.

Olbermann’s audience at 8 p.m. weeknights averaged about 1.1 million people in October, according to the network. He launched “Countdown” in 2003.

Olbermann anchored MSNBC’s election coverage Tuesday night. The revelation of Olbermann’s contributions — first reported by Politico — means that the anchor was leading on-air coverage of races in which he had privately picked favorites.

Federal Election Commission records show that on Oct. 28 Olbermann gave $2,400 each to Arizona Reps. Raul Grijalva and Gabrielle Giffords, and on Oct. 29 he donated $2,400 to Kentucky Senate candidate Jack Conway. The donation to Grijalva came on the same day the Democratic incumbent appeared on “Countdown,” Politico reported. Conway and Giffords have also appeared on the show.

Under FEC rules, $2,400 is the most an individual donor can give to a candidate in a general-election campaign.

[View Complete Article →]

Tags: ·

No Comments